Open letter to Nnamdi Kanu, IPOB by John Iloduba

Editor's note: In this piece, John Iloduba condemned the sit-at-home protest ordered by the Indigenous People of Biafra. Iloduba called on the IPOB and its leadership Nnamdi Kanu to desist from suppressing vulnerable Nigerians who have set out to make legitimate living by mandating them to shut down their businesses.

Repression of the innocent population of Nigerians by separatists in the South-East: the world must act now On May 30, 2017 small businesses in Abia, Anambra, Enugu, Imo and Ebonyi were forced shut down by separatists as part of activities marking the 50th anniversary of the declaration of the moribund Biafra Republic. The separatists attempted the same economic blockade to some extent in Rivers, Delta and Bayelsa states while they were completely rebuffed in Edo, Akwa-Ibom and Cross River states. These separatists operated under names like Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Movement for the Actualization of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) Biafra Independence Movement (BIM) and assortments of street gangs that act as the militant wings of these groups.The extent of suffering and economic hardship unleashed on the helpless population can be gauged from the headlines of newspapers in the aftermath of the punitive action.

The Vanguard reported that "Biafra sit-at-home: Total shutdown in South-East" while the Sun read "Biafra: South-East shuts down" and the Guardian has "Sit-at-home order grounds South East". Separatists leaders quoted in all the reports gave the misleading impression that owners of these small shops and businesses voluntarily complied with the directive to shutter their premises to mark the anniversary of the tragic republic but the opposite was the case. Owners of these businesses were repeatedly threatened with arson, looting and abuse (of women) for any business that dares to defy the orders of the Biafran "Supreme Leader" not to open for transactions. Apparently, in an effort to avoid confrontation with the armed militant wing of the aforementioned groups, government security operatives refrained from interfering. Past interventions by security operatives to prevent economic blockades had resulted in their personnel being attacked and some killed by the militants in the process. Unfortunately, while the approach of the security agencies averted confrontations, the economic blockade has further impoverished the low income earners that were forced to go one day without earning their livelihood.It must be stated here that the majority of the families that bore the brunt of this oppression from Biafran militants earn less than $2 per day – the implication of this loss of income for one day will amplify over time to further impoverish them. More unfortunate is the fact that the sponsors and warlords that declared the forced closure have businesses that are considered too big to harass and were therefore not affected by the shutdown.Well meaning countries and international organizations must condemn the activities of the Biafran militants as the terrorism that it is. Actions must be demanded to protect the vulnerable population from being further impoverished by economic shutdowns that have no connection with the genuine calls for fiscal restructuring of Nigeria. Demands must be made of the Federal Government of Nigeria not to again abandon the well-being of its citizens for political consideration. It is the responsibility of the government, through its security and military agencies, to uphold the Constitutionally guaranteed freedom of movement and freedom to earn income from legitimate means that applies to all Nigerians. Yours faithfully John Paul Iloduba .